'We're not going back': Pritzker reacts to Walz-Vance VP debate

Loading Video…

This browser does not support the Video element.

This is what debates used to feel like: Thoughts on the Walz, Vance faceoff

FOX 32s political expert Paris Schutz shares his thoughts on the VP debate.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker on Tuesday night released a statement following the conclusion of the vice presidential debate between Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Ohio Sen. JD Vance.

You can read the full statement below:

"Gov. Tim Walz did the Midwest proud tonight, demonstrating for the nation that he will fight for working families and expand economic opportunity as our next Vice President. With Vice President Harris and Governor Tim Walz in the White House, Americans will have fierce champions for the middle class who have spent their lives lifting people up instead of tearing them down. That stands in stark contrast to Donald Trump, JD Vance, and their Project 2025 agenda. From trying to strip women of their right to reproductive healthcare to giving tax breaks to the wealthiest at the expense of our middle class, Trump and Vance want to take us backwards – but we’re not going back. Tonight, Gov. Tim Walz made that clear and I’m proud to stand with him as a fellow Midwest Governor today and look forward to voting for this ticket come November."

Loading Video…

This browser does not support the Video element.

Chicago voters react to VP debate between Walz, Vance

What did Chicago voters think of the debate between Gov. Tim Walz and Sen. JD Vance?

Here is a live look at the debate (estimated times are in Eastern Daylight Time):

10:28 p.m. Walz and Vance discuss threats to democracy

While Walz and Vance both appeared to agree that there should be a peaceful transfer of power once the November election is over, Walz leaned into Trump's inflammatory comments to his supporters on Jan. 6 in the run up to the Capitol riot in 2021. 

When asked if he would challenge this year's election results, Vance didn't give a clear answer and defended Trump, claiming the former president encouraged "peaceful" protests at the Capitol in 2021. 

10:01 p.m. Walz and Vance appear to find common ground on gun violence

Vance suggests making doors and windows strong to curb gun violence in schools. 

Walz again mentions that he is a gun owner and believes there are common sense gun policies that can be put in place to eliminate gun violence in schools and in communities. Vance was seen shaking his head in agreement with Walz. 

9:45 p.m. Walz targets Trump during abortion discussion 

Walz addressed questions about abortion access with anecdotes to emphasize the importance for parents to access to this type of health care. 

Walz said that Trump, who appointed the Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v. Wade, set "this all into motion." 

"This is about health care," Walz added. 

Loading Video…

This browser does not support the Video element.

Immediate reaction following Walz-Vance debate

The Walz-Vance debate is over, so who won?

9:40 p.m. Walz muddles Tianamen Square comments, Vance addresses past criticisms of Trump

Vance was asked to address his past biting criticisms of the former president, including once suggesting Trump would be "America’s Hitler."

"When you get something wrong and you change your mind, you ought to be honest with the American people," he said Tuesday.

Walz, meanwhile, was pressed on his misleading claim, which was investigated this week by Minnesota Public Radio and other outlets, that he was in Hong Kong during the turbulence surrounding the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, part of a broader pattern of inaccuracies that Republicans hope to exploit.

Confronted with his misstatements about his travels to China years ago, Walz defended himself by saying, "I’ve not been perfect." In fact, he said, "I’m a knucklehead at times." Eventually, he acknowledged he misspoke about his history.

9:29 p.m. Mics cut as Vance tries to interrupt moderators after claimed fact-checking

Vance pushed back on the CBS News moderators during the debate, noting that they said they would not fact-check the candidates.

The moderators attempted to fact-check Vance, saying that many Haitian residents in Springfield, Ohio have legal temporary status. Vance jumped in to "say what's actually going on."

While explaining the process and tying it to a Harris-backed process, the moderators spoke over him, sarcastically thanking him for "describing the legal process" before they cut off his microphone as Walz attempted to argue with him.

"We have so much we have to get to, thank you so much for explaining the legal process," Margaret Brennan said before asking her co-moderator to ask the next question.

9:19 p.m. Vance and Walz tackle immigration and the border crisis during the debate

Vance echoed Trump by repeatedly calling Harris the "border czar" and suggested that she, as vice president, single-handedly rolled back the immigration restrictions Trump had imposed as president. The result, in Vance’s telling, is an unchecked flow of fentanyl, strain on state and local resources and increased housing prices around the country.

Harris was never asked to be the "border czar" and she was never specifically given the responsibility for security on the border. She was tasked by Biden in March 2021 with tackling the "root causes" of migration from the Central American countries of Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador and pushing leaders there and in Mexico to enforce immigration laws. Harris was not empowered to set U.S. immigration policy — only the president can sign executive orders and Harris was not empowered as Biden’s proxy in negotiations with Congress on immigration law.

Walz advanced Democrats’ arguments that Trump single-handedly killed a bipartisan Senate deal to tighten border security and boost the processing system for immigrants and asylum seekers. Republicans backed off the deal, Walz noted, only after Trump said it wasn’t good enough.

Loading Video…

This browser does not support the Video element.

Did the VP debate sway undecided voters? Expert weighs in

Did the VP debate between Gov. Tim Walz and Sen. JD Vance sway undecided voters Tuesday night? We asked an expert.

9:12 p.m. Helene's devastation 1 of top issues discussed during debate

Walz took the opportunity to direct the question about Helene toward a conversation about climate change. 

Both men found unity on Hurricane Helene, which has devastated several states and caused massive flooding in North Carolina in particular. Walz mentioned the storm’s devastation and talked about working with governors across the country, saying they don’t let politics get in the way of collaborating.

"I think it's important for us, first of all, to say, Donald Trump and I support clean air, clean water. We want the environment to be cleaner and safer. But one of the things that I've noticed, some of our Democratic friends talking a lot about is a concern about carbon emissions. This idea that carbon emissions drives all of the climate change. Well, let's just say that's true just for the sake of argument so we're not arguing about weird science," Vance said

9:05 p.m. Debate begins with questions regarding Iran's missile barrage on Israel

Starting off the vice presidential debate, Vance and Walz were asked about the recent missile barrage Iran launched on Israel.

Walz began the night by thanking the American people for tuning into the debate and criticized Trump's actions and policies. 

Walz, answering a question on whether he'd support a preemptive strike on Iran as it's launched missiles into Israel.

"What’s fundamental here is that steady leadership is going to matter," said Walz."And the world saw it on that debate stage a few weeks ago, a nearly 80-year-old Donald Trump talking about crowd sizes is not what we need in this moment."

Vance also thanked Americans for tuning in and defended Trump against Walz, also stating that a pre-emptive strike is up to Israel.